TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
For the next job. The bold idea. The life you can already picture.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
Hypothetical example: a North Frontenac household works entirely over a satellite connection. She manages payroll and benefits for a Kingston construction group from a home office; he is a licensed millwright who travels to plant shutdowns for weeks at a time. An American software company offers her a fully remote position and tells her that the job can be done from anywhere, which is true of the work and untrue of the immigration question. If she performs that job from the township, she is working in Canada for a foreign employer and needs no United States status at all. If the company later wants her at its site, or she chooses to move the family south, the same job becomes work performed in the United States and requires a classification that fits both her occupation and the employer's identity.
The six routes on this site are not a ladder from easy to hard; they answer different questions and only one of them is likely to be yours. The professional route asks whether a Canadian citizen has prearranged professional work, in a listed occupation, in the United States for a U.S. or foreign employer, without U.S. self-employment. The two transfer routes ask whether an existing company relationship and a year of qualifying employment abroad support moving a manager or a specialist. The treaty investor route asks whether a Canadian has irrevocably committed substantial capital to a real business they will direct. The immigrant investor route asks for a far larger sum, a lawful source for every dollar and ten jobs. The Gold Card is a separate official framework built on a gift to the United States rather than an investment. Reading them as a menu wastes months; reading them as questions usually narrows the household to one.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
For a North Frontenac resident with an American job offer, three facts settle eligibility before any form is opened.

For a household whose work is done remotely, treating a job as portable because the laptop is can create a status error. Status follows the body, not the contract. A Canadian working from a North Frontenac kitchen table for an American employer is outside the U.S. immigration system, with tax and payroll consequences worth advice but no U.S. visa question; the moment that person performs the same work from inside the United States, a classification is required, and an offer letter written for a remote arrangement may not contain what a border officer needs to read. Decide first where each adult in the house will actually be, then choose the route.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
For each working adult, write down the country they will physically be in on an ordinary Tuesday six months from now. That single line eliminates most of the routes for most households before anyone reads a rule.
A United States entity, a Canadian entity, a client, or nobody because the person is self-employed. Each answer opens different routes and closes others, and a contractor arrangement is not the same as employment.
Two treaty routes depend on Canadian or Mexican citizenship. A permanent-resident card is not citizenship, and a citizen by descent may need a certificate to prove what is already true.
A school year, a closing date, a child's twenty-first birthday, a seasonal contract. Put them in one calendar and work backwards; most failed plans failed on sequence rather than eligibility.
Remote work has made this township part of several labour markets at once, and that cuts both ways. It means a North Frontenac professional can hold an American job without moving, and it means an American employer may assume a move is trivial when it is the hardest part of the arrangement. The households that do this well treat the immigration question as a design constraint on the offer itself: they ask for the job title and duties to be written accurately before signing, they establish whether the employer has ever petitioned for anyone, and they decide as a family whether one person's opportunity is worth the other person's pause. Those conversations are cheaper before the acceptance than after the resignation.
Find your pathwayShneur Herman, Jo Kubti and Alexander Paton work with North Frontenac households remotely. The review begins with facts rather than forms: who is a citizen of what, who employs whom, whose money is at risk, and which dates cannot move. Documents can be exchanged and reviewed electronically, and calls can be scheduled around shift work and seasonal contracts.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Not for work performed in Canada. Status is required for work performed in the United States. Ask an accountant about the payroll and tax side of a cross-border arrangement, which is a separate question from immigration.
A letter matters, but it has to name a profession that appears on the treaty list and describe duties that match it. A generic letter about a valued employee can be a reason a professional application fails at the border.
It helps for a transfer if the American company's ownership mirrors the Canadian one, and it complicates the investor route, where the applicant must ordinarily own a majority or show operational control. The structure should be decided before anything is incorporated.
It depends which status. Spouses of treaty investors and of intracompany transferees are employment-authorized incident to status; dependants of professionals are not. That difference often decides which household member's plan should lead.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.